Institute for Legal, Legislative and Educational Action
Doctor Gary Gonsalves is an anesthesiologist in southern California. He saw an article in a medical journal that said the recent flood of gun-regulations in California was only a good start, but probably not enough. The article also called for more government funded anti-gun propaganda and more “gun-control”. I helped Dr Gonsalves with facts and references. Here is our article. A revised edition appeared in his medical journal today.
“Taking the Cure to Stop Violence” by Gary Gonsalves, M.D. and Rob Morse
In reference to Dr. Rita Agarwal’s “Gun Violence: When will we make a change”, she makes an emotional appeal for “gun control” while conveniently ignoring the science that she calls on us to embrace:
So let’s look at the facts, while being sensitive to emotions elicited by hysterical claims and the toxic effects of interpersonal violence.
The fact is that we are not facing an epidemic of armed violence in the United States. Rates of armed homicide declined 50% over the last 30 years while firearms ownership has doubled (1)(2). Further, the U.S. is ranked 11th for the incidence of mass murder per 100 thousand when compared against European countries. The U.S. is more peaceful per person than France, Switzerland, Norway or Belgium during the last 7 years (3). While statistics don’t and shouldn’t change our emotional reaction to human suffering, when properly employed, they can provide a foundation for critical analysis. So let’s consider the research.
In 2013, The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, in cooperation with the CDC, outlined potential research via “Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence”, but we need not await their results as ample research already indicates that, at a minimum, 4 out of 5 criminals obtain their firearms illegally (4)(5)(6). Intuitively, we all know that criminals don’t care if they follow gun laws, which explains why gun laws have no effect on the rate at which criminals use firearms. I have no way to know if Dr. Agarwal is aware of these findings, but I am certain that the new California gun control laws that she calls a “good first step”, are anything but (7). Rather, they are merely seven more laws added to the already existing 23 thousand gun control laws at the local, state and federal level. While it may seem cliché, the truth is that criminals don’t follow the law and making criminals out of law-abiding citizens does nothing to make us all safer.
Again referencing the research, a 2007 study from Harvard University titled “Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?” concluded it would not. “Stricter laws don’t mean there is less crime”(8). This was further reinforced by the recent revelation that after more than 20 years, the Brady (gun control) Bill has failed to reduce suicide or homicide (9). Even the spokespeople for gun control groups frequently admit that so called gun control laws don’t stop criminals from obtaining firearms. Michael Beard, director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence said, “I would agree that clearly no law is going to prevent criminals from getting handguns or any kind of weapon they want….You can’t take guns away from criminals”(10). Josh Sugarmann of the Violence Policy Center said, “Handgun controls do little to stop criminals from obtaining handguns” (11).
We see further confirming evidence daily. If gun control laws worked, then the cities of Oakland, Newark and Chicago would be our safest cities rather than some of our most dangerous. Gun laws don’t work, because they fail to address the actual problem. Calling for more failed gun laws is a quick emotional, but irrational fix, when we should rather be implementing the following approach as suggested by the CDC,
“Effective approaches for preventing violence include early education through school-based programs addressing social, emotional, and behavioral competencies; parent and family-based programs promoting positive relationships, communication, support, and proper supervision; and efforts to improve school, neighborhood, and community environments in ways that reduce the likelihood of violence.¶ Promoting the capacity of communities to implement such approaches might prove essential to achieving population-level impacts.” (12)
As physicians, we all recognize the potential danger of bad prescriptions. So what could be the harm in disarming law-abiding individuals? Many independent studies cite research showing that law abiding gun owners use a firearm for self-defense thousands of times every day (13). Ordinary citizens often defend themselves without having to discharge their firearm. Further, when it comes to protecting victims of violent crime such as rape, a review of Justice Department data from 1979-1985 revealed that when a victim used a gun to resist “stranger” rape the probability of completing the rape was 0.1% and injury to the victim was 0%. In comparison, unarmed victims suffered the rape act 31% of the time and had other violent injuries 40% of the time (14). Further, as you would expect, gun ownership is most effective in protecting those segments of society who receive the least attention from police. Hence, personal firearm ownership, and the positive perception thereof, is growing rapidly among urban minorities who own guns as a positive tool for their own protection, as gang violence is an unfortunate reality for them (15)(16).
Yes, we have a persistent problem with violent gangs in some of our inner cities. The most dangerous of these cities have been run by Democrats for decades (17). These cities suffer under the failed political policies that killed jobs and broke up families. As social dynamics collapsed, young people found “family” in gangs. The illicit-drug industry provided the financial means to survive. In short, drug-gangs replaced functional households, while entire neighborhoods were ruled by the most violent among them. According to the FBI’s 2011 National Gang threat Assessment (the last year for which approximate numbers were provided) there are approximately 1.4 million gang members in the United States. These gang members “are responsible for an average of 48 percent of violent crime in most jurisdictions and up to 90 percent in several others”(18). This means that 0.4% of our population is responsible for 48-90% of our violent crime. Note that California’s new “gun laws” are directed at the 99.6% of our population that isn’t part of the problem. This is insane.
Conversely, when we remove these same cities from U.S. statistics, our country becomes one of the safest places in the world. As a matter of fact, in Plano, Texas, where they have amongst the highest number of guns per citizen, their murder rate is so low that if Plano were its own country, it would have the second lowest homicide rate in the world (19). Clearly we know what works to make us safe…and what doesn’t. Most politicians realize this, but use gun-control laws as an ineffective crutch because they are unwilling or unable to address the much larger and more difficult issue of inner-city social collapse. Honest citizens suffer under an obscene number of firearms laws and regulations.
But what can we do right now to decrease violence involving firearms today?
In short, I reject Dr. Agarwal’s call for gun-control. She advocates an ineffective approach while denying the existence of the science that she calls on us to embrace. She has used an emotional plea to help achieve a political goal that has yet to solve any problems.
On the other hand, I will do my best to implement strategies to effect substantial positive change. While not all things can be changed, nothing can be changed until it’s faced in earnest.
~_~_
Gary Gonsalves, M.D. is a board certified, private practice Anesthesiologist in San Diego county. He sits on the Advisory Board for San Diego County Gun Owners. Via www.SanDiegoShootingSocial.com he has personally overseen the firearms training of hundreds of doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals while raising money to support local charities. He can be reached at GaryGonsalvesMD@gmail.com
Rob Morse is a design engineer and firearms instructor in Louisiana. He writes at Ammoland, at his Slowfacts blog, and at Clash Daily. Rob co-hosts the Polite Society Podcast, and hosts the Self-Defense Gun Stories Podcast each week.
References:
https://slowfacts.wordpress.com/2016/08/29/taking-the-cure-to-stop-violence/