Institute for Legal, Legislative and Educational Action
There are simply too many targets for police to be able to guard everyone. And even when they are in the right place at the right time, an officer’s uniform is like a neon sign saying, “Shoot me first.”
It’s also not realistic to keep terrorists and criminals from getting weapons. The war on guns has been as much of a failure as the war on drugs. Terrorists can also resort to homemade bombs, and have lately made a habit of using vehicles as weapons.
What happens when background checks on gun purchases inevitably fail to stop these killers from attacking? What is the backup plan?
Shortly after the attack at the Sutherland Springs church on Nov. 5, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) warned: “This is going to happen again, and so we need people in churches — either professional security, or at least arming some of the parishioners or the congregation — so that they can respond if something like this… when something like this happens again.”
An article in the Wall Street Journal on Sunday discussed how parishioners across the country are starting to carry permitted concealed handguns at church.
Paxton isn’t alone in his view that people have to take responsibility for their own safety. Ron Noble, the Secretary General of INTERPOL from 2000 to 2014, cautioned that even with “extraordinary security,” it would be virtually impossible to keep weapons out of soft targets. This means that only the terrorists will have weapons.
Permit holders have stopped dozens of would-be mass public shootings in malls, churches, schools, universities and town centers. Gun control advocates perennially fear that a permit holder will accidentally shoot a bystander, or that a police officer will accidentally harm a permit holder. But this has never happened in a mass public shooting.
Permit holders are also incredibly law-abiding. According to my research, Americans as a whole commit crimes 37 times more frequently than do police officers, but police themselves commit crimes at seven times the rate of permit holders in Florida and Texas.
The heroic actions of Stephen Willeford on Nov. 5 are a testament to the power of a good guy with a gun. He saved many lives at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas. The killer, Devin Kelley, was circling back to shoot the wounded when Willeford showed up with a rifle. Willeford’s fast actions stopped Kelley’s attack, saving the lives of the twenty wounded and possibly many more.
But Willeford isn’t alone. Permit holders have stopped some other church attacks over the last decade. For example:
Normally, churches are easy targets. Some killers have even picked churches for precisely this reason.
Both Michigan and South Carolina prohibit concealed handguns in church. That's not surprising — these mass public shootings happen practically every single time in gun free zones. Over 98 percent of all mass public shootings since 1950 have taken place in areas where general citizens are prohibited from carrying firearms.
We can’t just keep ignoring the fact that killers pick targets where people can’t defend themselves. We should be a lot more afraid of the killers than we should be of permit holders. It’s understandable not to want to even think about self-defense while praying at church.
But these attacks become massacres when there's no one to fight back. Permit holders who carry in the course of daily life should be able to bring their guns to church. They should be able to protect their fellow worshipers.
John Lott, Jr. is the president of the Crime Prevention Research Center and author of “The War on Guns” (Regnery, 2016).